Praises, Critiques as San Francisco recommends paying $5m to Blacks

San Francisco has recommended a program of reparations for Black residents, which would allocate funding towards addressing the historic injustices experienced by the Black community in the city. The program is expected to address issues such as access to education, healthcare, and housing, and is seen as a step towards rectifying past discriminatory policies.
However, the program has been met with both support and criticism. Some proponents argue that it is a necessary step towards addressing the harm caused by systemic racism and redlining in the city, while others express concerns about the cost and the potential exclusion of other marginalized groups.

The program's cost is estimated to be around $120 million annually, a significant portion of the city's budget. While this has raised concerns about the feasibility of the program, its supporters argue that it is a small price to pay for addressing the lasting impact of discriminatory policies on the Black community.

San Francisco's proposal is part of a growing national conversation around reparations, with some advocating for federal-level programs to address historic injustices experienced by marginalized groups.

Critics from different spectrum of the divide however believes it is not economically viable to pay all Black folks $5 million dollars in San Francisco, as this would be an astronomical sum of money that would far exceed the city's budget and likely have negative economic implications.

San Francisco's program of reparations is estimated to cost around $120 million annually, which would be distributed among eligible Black residents in the form of targeted investments in areas such as education, healthcare, and housing. While this is a significant amount of money, it is a more realistic and feasible approach than providing all Black residents with a lump sum payment of $5 million.

If the city were to pay $5 million to each Black resident, it would cost billions of dollars, which would far exceed the city's annual budget and likely require significant tax increases or other austerity measures. This could have negative economic implications, including slowing down economic growth and reducing the city's ability to provide essential services to all residents.

Furthermore, it is important to note that the goal of reparations is not simply to provide financial compensation, but to address the systemic injustices and harm caused by historic discriminatory policies. Targeted investments in education, healthcare, and housing can help to address these issues in a more effective and sustainable way. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Fat women are still beautiful: but beware of obesity

CHILD MARRIAGE: I'M GETTING MARRIED TO MY "GRANPA"-THE WISH OF THE GODS?

The Impact of Aging on Female Sexual Desire: What Men Need to Know to Keep the Spark Alive